Forum Discussion
120hz or 1080p ++?
Hello What do you think should be the priority for improvment of the screen ? A lot of ppl say 120hz, but from what I could test, the resolution should be better to work on. Its so frustrating ...
While 120Hz is indeed crucial, a higher resolution will help fight nausea more in the short term (higher PPD). Assuming the average computer will struggle running current games at 60fps, more resolution is the way to go for now. There's almost zero point in prefering 120Hz equipment if 99% of the high end computers can't render the heaviest games at that fps. Also reducing the latency and making the rift wireless is more crucial than anything else.
2Khz panel with 14mpixels per eye ftw :P
2560x1600 is the way to go for the commercial verion :)
2Khz panel with 14mpixels per eye ftw :P
"huntinator7" wrote:
I saw a video from CES in January demoing a 6.1" Sharp WQXGA 2560x1600 smartphone screen, and immediately thought of this. The size is right, resolution is off the charts, PPI is over 500, and sounds like the perfect fit for Oculus. No clue if its PenTile or not, and the only thing that I could see causing issues is that it is 16:10, versus the 16:9 of the FHD Oculus at E3. I could so see this being the consumer Oculus screen.
2560x1600 is the way to go for the commercial verion :)