Forum Discussion

🚨 This forum is archived and read-only. To submit a forum post, please visit our new Developer Forum. 🚨
physto's avatar
physto
MHCP Member
5 years ago

Should we be using the Universal Render Pipeline?

My current project is still on the legacy renderer.  Should I be using the URP for performance?

8 Replies

  • physto's avatar
    physto
    MHCP Member
    5 years ago
    Sorry. Not sure what the correct name is but I was referring to the best pipeline for Unity which may or may not still be called the Lightweight Render Pipeline. Is anyone using that for Quest?
  • K9Ch33tah's avatar
    K9Ch33tah
    Honored Guest
    5 years ago
    I'm currently using URP It but depends if you want to use some urp feature like shader graph. Otherwise 3d is a bit more stable at the moment.
  • physto's avatar
    physto
    MHCP Member
    5 years ago

    K9Ch33tah said:

    I'm currently using URP It but depends if you want to use some urp feature like shader graph. Otherwise 3d is a bit more stable at the moment.



    I can live without shader graph if I need to. Just wondering if the performance of the URP is acceptable on Quest.
  • rib's avatar
    rib
    Protege
    5 years ago
    I've been using LWRP, now URP for fair while on Quest and I've been happy with the performance so far (profiling, I'm able to hit 70fps ok with the content I'm building). I currently have a separate render pipeline asset configured for Quest vs PC to tune it a little.
  • mightycoconut's avatar
    mightycoconut
    Protege
    5 years ago
    I'm using URP (upgraded from OG LWRP) and getting ~400k tris through it at steady 72fps. Had to optimize quite a bit, but pretty impressive. Some of the shaders on the avatars/controllers weren't supported so you might have to upgrade those yourself.
  • physto's avatar
    physto
    MHCP Member
    5 years ago

    rib said:

    I've been using LWRP, now URP for fair while on Quest and I've been happy with the performance so far (profiling, I'm able to hit 70fps ok with the content I'm building). I currently have a separate render pipeline asset configured for Quest vs PC to tune it a little.


    Thanks. I'm going branch and upgrade from legacy to URP and see how it goes.

  • physto's avatar
    physto
    MHCP Member
    5 years ago


    I'm using URP (upgraded from OG LWRP) and getting ~400k tris through it at steady 72fps. Had to optimize quite a bit, but pretty impressive. Some of the shaders on the avatars/controllers weren't supported so you might have to upgrade those yourself.


    > ~400k tris through it at steady 72fps.
    WOW! I'm been budgeting for ~50K and trying to limit the number of materials and textures.

    Any chance you can, in general terms, talk about what you're optimized?

  • physto's avatar
    physto
    MHCP Member
    5 years ago

    mightycoconut said:

    I'm using URP (upgraded from OG LWRP) and getting ~400k tris through it at steady 72fps. Had to optimize quite a bit, but pretty impressive. Some of the shaders on the avatars/controllers weren't supported so you might have to upgrade those yourself.



    You mean Quest 1 not Quest 2, right?