SitRep on the UDK situation?

"unity2k" wrote:
Hey HappyHimitsu, as a matter of fact Nate said a few weeks with an emphasis on "Earliest." And just because we've been waiting a couple of days, that doesn't mean these guys are not super busy. We don't know if they are inspecting new screens off in Korea or visiting someone who has a new angle on positional tracking. I think some patience here is in order, but after a week wait we should pull out the virtual pitchforks! ;)

Fair enough unity2k, but I don't think I was too rude or overbearing and a wee bit of pressure doesn't hurt. While I appreciate your moderation perhaps you should save it for those on the forum who are really deserving. ;)

I am well aware of what Nate said, and his intent behind it, but it has been my experience on these forums that if you want an answer to something you sometimes have to push a little. Thanks for the help though, and if you happen to catch me doing something really out of line, you have my permission (and my buttocks) presented, and you may be free to give them a nice firm smacking! ;)

(Not trying to be a smart-alecky asshole; I respect what you are saying, but I can't resist having a little bit of fun. :))

Edit: I just wanted to clarify here that I was not asking for Oculus to provide an update to the program, but rather I was hoping they would take a moment out of their busy schedule to just let us know how things are going in that regard.
I have a vested interest in Oculus plan of attack regarding the UDK and as such I thought it would be nice to know how things are going.

:)