So, apparently Mark Zuckerberg is officially supporting Hillary Clinton, the sociopath criminal and liar. The FBI is issuing immunities to all of her underlings as of late. And Mark encourages Facebook employees to vote for Hillary Clinton, democrats. Apparently if you don't, then your job safety is in question. This is the literal definition of being tyrannical. So I understand it this way, that facebook, thus Oculus, is supporting a sociopath criminal into office.
So, it's quite nuts that America has devolved to this level.
In my country you can advertise all you want your political affiliations without any consequences. Nobody cares. You might get a nice conversation at the dinner table, but the way people are flaming in America it's incomprehensible, it's like war, a civil war.
I have no problem with someone professing the merits of their political candidate of choice, but what Palmer is doing is flat out harmful to free speech. He is basically trying to overload the internet with positive "Trumpisms" and negative and fraudulent "Clintonisms". These type of paid shills will go as far as bullying anyone commenting negatively about their posts, gang up to down mod anything against them and gang up to up mod their agenda. Basically paying an army of posters to troll forums for the benefit of his candidate.
YouTube is now essentially recruiting an army of SJWs to report "hurtful" videos on YouTube. Not a good idea to hire trolls to police other trolls!
So I see Palmer"s alleged activities as far less injurious than youTube's new policy, which is an OFFICIAL policy now on YouTube. Palmer is a private individual and can donate to whatever causes he pleases.
It's interesting how easily you take the logical leap to label someone as "tyrannical," yet you so quickly refuse to acknowledge that Trump is racist,
I wasn't planning on bringing up politics, but calling someone a racist is just a fancy form of name calling. It's an acknowledgment that you disagree with someone's positions and nothing more. A statement is either true or false; calling it "racist" doesn't invalidate it unless you can prove that it's false.
I can name many things that Hillary and Obama have done that can be called "racist." By the way, Trump just did a town hall at a black church last night.
I wasn't planning on bringing up politics, but calling someone a racist is just a fancy form of name calling.
More than just a label is being thrown around, try reading the entire thread to see where factual evidence is presented. Calling the sky blue is not a fancy form of name calling.
By the way, Trump just did a town hall at a black church last night.
Oh my, lol
Do you know what exact religious denomination this Church promotes? I don't think "black" is an actual belief system. Share more of your views on Racism buddy. Compelling stuff 😄
I think the problem here is that people assume that someone who is anti-hillary is also pro trump, and vice versa. I'm anti hillary AND anti-trump. I appreciate the truth being shared about the evils of both candidates, and honestly a few attack ads on Hillary don't bother me a bit. They're probably all true. I don't get why people are so bent out of shape over this.
By the way, Trump just did a town hall at a black church last night.
Oh my, lol
Do you know what exact religious denomination this Church promotes? I don't think "black" is an actual belief system. Share more of your views on Racism buddy. Compelling stuff 😄
You've never heard of the term "black church" before!? Duh! It's a standard political term used by both the right and the left. If you think that's "racist" then you must think everything is racist.
