07-03-2016 11:58 AM
07-03-2016 12:04 PM
07-03-2016 12:10 PM
07-03-2016 12:23 PM
07-03-2016 12:23 PM
07-03-2016 12:23 PM
Solsland said:
None of the games I play (and I have bought plenty) are any better visually. if you have a 970 or better, stay with it.
07-03-2016 12:27 PM
07-03-2016 12:33 PM
Solsland said:
There is absolutely no way that you will see a difference that is worth paying that sort of money.
07-03-2016 12:39 PM
07-03-2016 01:14 PM
Zenbane said:
Solsland said:
There is absolutely no way that you will see a difference that is worth paying that sort of money.
The level of aggression you're using to describe a fairly small amount of money to anyone making upper middle class (and above) salary isn't really having the impact you might have planned.
Right next to my Oculus Ready PC with a GTX 980 graphics card is a Windows XP machine, running a graphics card from the 1990's. I have the following games running on it:
1) Dungeon Keeper 1 & 2
2) WarCraft 2
3) Thief 1 & 2
If I look at those graphics and compare to anything, both VR and traditional gaming, on my $2,000 gaming rig... I could easily argue that the difference isn't worth the price increase. If I show WarCraft to a non-gamer and then show them Chronos or Eve, they will just say, "yeah one game looks a bit better than the other." Is it $2,000's worth better? Purely subjective; based solely on the level of gaming enthusiasm.
I also have my Atari 2600... and if I put it up against my PS3, sure I can see a noticeable difference. Is the difference worth decades of console war debate on forums? Not really lol
If the 1080 isn't worth it for your yearly salary then great; but you may wanna take a step back and stop acting as though you discovered some great secret.