09-22-2020 11:19 AM
More info here about the software used etc.:
https://babeltechreviews.com/vr-wars-the-rtx-2070-vs-the-gtx-1080-vs-the-vega-64/
- and the results in short:
In average RTX 2070 is only 7 % faster than GTX 1080. And 7 % - how many would notice that in a blind test!? (Especially with vsync on) Sure some games are up to nearly 20 % faster using RTX 2070 than GTX 1080, but one game was even 5 % slower! (Ethan Carter).
Has the old Series 10 been more optimized for VR than Series 20? And how about Series 30? (Huang did not mention VR with one word when introducing 3080, clearly VR has low priority)
Now, what if we compare 2070 FE vs. 1080 FE in 23 pancake games - then we can see - average results:
Source: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-founders-edition/
Using 1920x1080 res, 2070 FE is 12 % faster than 1080 FE. That's nearly twice the difference we saw when combining 11 VR games. Thus using pancake games to assume VR performance difference may lead to overestimating performance differences - and it's much worse for 4K pancakes:
Source: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-founders-edition/
In 4K res, the 2070 is average 19 % faster than GTX 1080.
Now, the VR results were obtained using CV1 - might be different with Index or G2, we don't know that. What the above results do suggest is that VR performance differences may be much more subtle than performance differences in pancake games. For now using pancake games to estimate performance gains in VR games and apps when upgrading a video card may not be easy and may lead to wrong estimation, so beware.
The reviewers behind the testing of 11 VR games also have a RTX 3080 - I'll contact them and hear if they would consider some RTX 3080 VR testing - we need to know the real numbers!
Oculus Rift CV1, Valve Index & PSVR2, Asus Strix OC RTX™ 3090, i9-10900K (5.3Ghz), 32GB 3200MHz, 16TB SSD
"Ask not what VR can do for you, but what you can do for VR"
09-22-2020 12:15 PM
Hi Rune,
Oculus Rift CV1, Valve Index & PSVR2, Asus Strix OC RTX™ 3090, i9-10900K (5.3Ghz), 32GB 3200MHz, 16TB SSD
"Ask not what VR can do for you, but what you can do for VR"
09-22-2020 12:18 PM
09-22-2020 12:28 PM
RedRizla said:
@RuneSR2 -Which VR headsets is he going to benchmark with the 3080?
Oculus Rift CV1, Valve Index & PSVR2, Asus Strix OC RTX™ 3090, i9-10900K (5.3Ghz), 32GB 3200MHz, 16TB SSD
"Ask not what VR can do for you, but what you can do for VR"
09-22-2020 12:30 PM
RuneSR2 said:
RedRizla said:
@RuneSR2 -Which VR headsets is he going to benchmark with the 3080?
I don't know - he/they have different hmds - I doubt it will be CV1 😉
They used Vive Pro for some of their latest reviews. Might be a nice choice with Index res.
09-22-2020 12:34 PM
Thank-you for your suggestions, Rune.
Oculus Rift CV1, Valve Index & PSVR2, Asus Strix OC RTX™ 3090, i9-10900K (5.3Ghz), 32GB 3200MHz, 16TB SSD
"Ask not what VR can do for you, but what you can do for VR"
09-22-2020 12:45 PM
RuneSR2 said:
RedRizla said:
@RuneSR2 -Which VR headsets is he going to benchmark with the 3080?
I don't know - he/they have different hmds - I doubt it will be CV1 😉
They used Vive Pro for some of their latest reviews. Might be a nice choice with Index res.
And maybe I should get a Vive Pro - already have base stations and Knuckles, and my love for oled is growing these days...
09-22-2020 12:49 PM
09-22-2020 12:59 PM
I'd say that's hard to say from this test because you're comparing a 1080, the high end line against a lower tier in the 2070. 1080 vs 2080 would be a more apples to apples comparison. I'm sure the 2070 was chosen because the cost is closer to what the 1080 was but the 2000 line was just overpriced due to the RTX chip. Since ray tracing hasn't hit VR at this point, the RTX portion is irrelevant.
09-22-2020 01:02 PM