08-24-2020 10:03 PM
08-25-2020 03:53 PM
08-25-2020 04:26 PM
08-25-2020 04:42 PM
Zenbane said:
With contract laws in the US, if a contract is proven to have something in it that is a clear violation of an existing law, or otherwise deemed unethical, then the contract is null and void.
So yes, while anyone can take advantage of contracts by adding extra jargon that people don't bother to read, that extra jargon can't be illegal or unethical, or else it is non-binding.
I get that the whole "offering your first born as payment" is meant to be an extreme analogy. But just to be clear, using humans as a form of payment is illegal in the US, lmao. So... that couldn't literally be placed inside a ToS, or other legally binding contract.
08-25-2020 05:12 PM
wuzp said:
Zenbane said:
With contract laws in the US, if a contract is proven to have something in it that is a clear violation of an existing law, or otherwise deemed unethical, then the contract is null and void.
So yes, while anyone can take advantage of contracts by adding extra jargon that people don't bother to read, that extra jargon can't be illegal or unethical, or else it is non-binding.
I get that the whole "offering your first born as payment" is meant to be an extreme analogy. But just to be clear, using humans as a form of payment is illegal in the US, lmao. So... that couldn't literally be placed inside a ToS, or other legally binding contract.
I can't find it, but there's another example "somewhere" on the Internet of a TOS in which you agree to clean the boss' house every week.
08-25-2020 05:27 PM
08-25-2020 06:40 PM
08-25-2020 06:43 PM
Zenbane said:
Because even if the ToS does demand your child, the Law won't let it happen.
08-25-2020 10:41 PM
08-25-2020 10:58 PM
08-26-2020 02:28 AM