03-28-2014 10:17 AM
03-28-2014 03:59 PM
03-28-2014 04:24 PM
03-28-2014 05:19 PM
03-28-2014 05:32 PM
"Dexter111" wrote:
Oculus was pretty much on track and every hope for VR enthusiasts and gamers until the buyout and were on track of delivering the best consumer version they could growing naturally from there, they may have resources in the short term, but have absolutely no control over the long term development. Another hire obviously changes everything about that... somehow.
It's sad, because this means Valve is apparently out as possible competitor bringing everyone VR.
03-28-2014 05:40 PM
"rtweed" wrote:
I haven't overlooked it, it's just that nobody has announced that any such contractual obligation exists...
In the meantime, I'm cautiously optimistic now that we have Carmack and Abrash together, and I'm inclined to believe that these two know a lot more about the specifics of the agreement than we do and would have walked away if it was truly awful. I don't want to drag this thread down with negative speculation as we have no facts on this one way or the other at this point. That said, I would reiterate that it is cautious optimism and I'm keeping an open mind for now, as I believe we all should.
03-28-2014 06:29 PM
03-28-2014 06:45 PM
03-28-2014 07:01 PM
03-28-2014 07:07 PM
"Br0ken" wrote:
http://www.oculus.com/blog/introducing-michael-abrash-oculus-chief-scientist/
WOW! :shock:
03-28-2014 07:25 PM