oculus doesn't care if you get the vive instead, its your loss, the vive is probably the same as the dk2 steam bought the dk1 and adjusted it to create the vive 😛
honestly people think just by saying "CANCELLING MY ORDER IM GETTING THE VIV INSTEED" will make oculus lower their prices? no.
"in6seconds" wrote: honestly I don't know why the playstation vr is even relevant at this point
PS4 is a pretty awesome device for the price and it has been kicking the crap out of the Xbox One in sales, so it has a huge install base already.
For people who can't afford the first iteration of consumer PC VR (lets face it, it is priced for enthusiasts), PSVR will be a great option. The reviews speak for themselves, people that tried it, liked it.
You obviously haven't played one or done any sort of research if you are questioning the relevancy at this point.
interpolated frame rendering means it may seem smooth, but the simple truth is the PS4 simply doesn't have enough power to push any VR experiences more than very rudimentary single scenario demo like games.
"Tim74UK" wrote: interpolated frame rendering means it may seem smooth, but the simple truth is the PS4 simply doesn't have enough power to push any VR experiences more than very rudimentary single scenario demo like games.
Sony have announce over 100 games planned for PSVR and some of those titles are clearly more complex than 'single scenario demo' games so this is simply not correct.
PS4 doesn't have the power of a machine running a Rift or Vive but what it does have is a very fixed set of specs allowing developers to optimise everything as far as possible for a single machine architecture.
Why not actually wait and see what they come up with before making sweeping statements based solely on guesswork?
There was a claim from someone who used both and said the Vive gives a better epxerience.. if it turns out to be true and is able to use all Oculus apps and features then all of us CV1 owners will be the ones who are inferior.
I don't abide by premium this premium that, if it's cheaper and better w/o any premium attached then it is.
"Tim74UK" wrote: interpolated frame rendering means it may seem smooth, but the simple truth is the PS4 simply doesn't have enough power to push any VR experiences more than very rudimentary single scenario demo like games.
Sony have announce over 100 games planned for PSVR and some of those titles are clearly more complex than 'single scenario demo' games so this is simply not correct.
PS4 doesn't have the power of a machine running a Rift or Vive but what it does have is a very fixed set of specs allowing developers to optimise everything as far as possible for a single machine architecture.
Why not actually wait and see what they come up with before making sweeping statements based solely on guesswork?
My reasoning is that the PS4 can't even render current games at 1080p at 60fps....
Even with interpolation which creates an intermediate frame to push 60hz refresh to 120hz, the system itself still has to render 60fps stable... Which without reducing seriously the scope of the game there is no chance the PS4 can achieve.
