Still not sure if this is a positive or negative endorsement. It it's positive (which from the rest of the text in the post, it sounds like it is) then the whole argument is kind of dead. Though it may be a little too colorful language for some people, just be aware.
Still not sure if this is a positive or negative endorsement. It it's positive (which from the rest of the text in the post, it sounds like it is) then the whole argument is kind of dead. Though it may be a little too colorful language for some people, just be aware.
Yes and this particular poster has certainly gone out of his way in the past to make mountains out of mole hills. As you said, I am making a positive endorsement and that phrase "no-no spot" is incredibly harmless. Especially compared to say... the VR Porn threads or 90% of danknugz post history lol
There was no reason for luk to get so offended, especially considering my choice of words has angered him in the past, and he knows that I'm simply using my own sense of humor (none of which was directed at any individual whatsoever). My comment was about a game, and he immediately made references to my anatomy.
I honestly see nothing that I need to be aware of other than his inability to properly use the Ignore feature on the forum; as he has never liked any of my choice of words.
Still not sure if this is a positive or negative endorsement. It it's positive (which from the rest of the text in the post, it sounds like it is) then the whole argument is kind of dead. Though it may be a little too colorful language for some people, just be aware.
I just meant that his comment was, taken by itself, negative; not that it was positive or negative in the greater context. I'll admit that, in a way, I was poking fun at him for his choice of metaphor. Exactly which word followed "no-no" is immaterial - everyone knows what part(s) he meant.
And thanks, Cyber, for duly saying Zenbane's language in his original, called-out post was "too colorful for some people, just be aware."
Except that you didn't even deny that you had indeed meant "no-no spot" to mean "ass" until later in the argument.
Proving that you misread "spot" by turning in to "hole" should have been more than enough to prove that I didn't mean "ass." But you're determined so clarification continues. The degree of clarification increases based solely on each of your attempts to spin the truth.
Besides, I said it was "abstract" in the same post where I demonstrate you confusing a spot with a hole B)
