Looking for a space x contact

/r/Iamverysmart material right here.

Pro tip: The more you actually know, the less you feel/claim that you know anything. See Dunning-Kruger effect and Illusory superiority.

I find it interesting that individuals who are often most vocal about being highly intelligent are rarely able to point to any evidence of the application of the claimed intelligence.

The statistical evidence is rather slim in these areas. But we do have some. Since it is slim, this data, it's veracity is, er, bordering on arguable. Yet it exists and does show some interesting unexpected aspects.

That intelligence doe not have correlation to 'success'.

The problem being that success is an impression in the context of a societal norm, an impression by an individual, or group.

Since it is a universe of sense impression that is devoid of facts, and exists in reflective projected memory only, we are going to have a problem.

The nature of all our scientifically oriented observational conditionals, resides in adsorbed energetics in statistical averaging of the quantum interactive, and we consistently, in Newtonian and Einsteinian relativistic terms...arrive at the conclusion above, but, in relative terms ---we arrive at it in ignorance.

That circularity, in it's native insistence, is where it all falls apart, regarding moving forward in the act of surpassing limits, be it the speed of light, or self improvement. In the more advanced paradigm (Reductio ad absurdum) of the misnomer of 'reality', there is no difference between the two.

A given elevated capacity in rate of cognition, in a given lifetime, is opportunity, potential, and chance. In quantum vs relative terms, it is too low of an averaging set to be anything other than an unobserved differential.


As for difficulties in motion and act, think of it this way: You've got 1000 people pulling a stone, pulling as a group, all tied together. In that context, the pulling of the stone through the sand is relatively easy, in the individual sense. The stone remains relatively unnoticed by the thousand who have it in motion, as the load is shared.

If one of those thousand moves out of lock-step with the others, they are moving contrary to the 999 and the stone, and that individuation point encounters contrary pressures from both. The trick is to let go the stone pulling group and the load itself, and simply walk over the horizon, in whatever given direction. To be out of sight, so to speak. Disconnected from the group and the load. Potentials in horizons become endless, but unshared.

When encountering a stone pulling group and attempting to interject or involve one's self (exactly analogous to quantum vs relativistic/Newtonian), one encounters similar phenomena, and is left with the quandary of how to interact, or to attempt to interact at all. As above, so below.

So in summary, anyone can claim to be super-intelligent, without ever achieving anything, creating anything, providing any evidence or any indication whatsoever of this claimed intelligence?

And these 'super intelligent' individuals would be distinguishable from the rest of the population... how?

I'll assume this is a parody post (one mocking those amusing people who vaguely make referencesto Quantum Mechanics to sound like they are making a clever argument but clearly don't really know anything about it). If so, good work.

When I was five I invented a new language. No one else was able to understand me though. They were so dumb.

"Ashles" wrote:

I'll assume this is a parody post (one mocking those amusing people who vaguely make referencesto Quantum Mechanics to sound like they are making a clever argument but clearly don't really know anything about it). If so, good work.

Relevant XKCD

It's all about sorting. To also understand that the brain is plastic, but also driven into animal aspects, which are the origins of human mental inertia.

The less quick the cognitive aspect of a being is, the quicker they make decisions - in temporal relation to their cognitive function. A problem, an issue, a manipulation point emerges. One that can be seen to begin playing in this here thread.

When cognitive function limits are reached, so is the origin point of cognition similarly reached - which is hindbrain emotional framing of thought generation. The rise of emotional tinting in the decision making process. Ie, finality of positioning as a human safe-danger calculation based on input vs cognitive speed and cognitive process.

Thus the origins of propaganda and astroturfing in the modern aspects of manipulation of the masses.




124k views.

and... the ted talk on 'why i stopped watching porn', with 8 million views.

also, his protip should be seen as humour, and if it it is seen as a byword, then a person has a serious problem. They would be exploring the limits of their cognition and not realizing the animal within is coloring their thought generation.

Like gravitates toward like- the drift and colorant of the inner animal directive... but in that also lies problems, as a world with no differences means you are already dead.

There is no permanence in intelligence, exactly as my tagline states. Unless you fail to realize the inner animal filter directs it to be static. It is literally the question...of a question. The mental inertia is tied to actual physical pain and mental dissolution (fears, pain, etc) tied to actual alteration of one's own neural limits.

Regardless, this thread is destined to being a death spiral, as no other option is available, one might say.

Adios.

As someone who has actually studied and has qualifications in Experimental Psychology I can confirm that the last post is pretty much a random collection of vague psychological buzzwords arranged in a way that does not lead to any coherent point (and also flits from subject to subject without connection). Eg. use of the bizarre phrases like "hindbrain emotional framing of thought generation" - the hindbrain is in fact responsible for very basic functions - emotions are processed by fore- and mid-brain.
Simple summary: http://general-psychology.weebly.com/wh ... tions.html

Lack of clarity + use of random buzzwords =/= sounding like having a more intelligent and complex point.

"MrsVR" wrote:

Relevant XKCD

:D

I'd be very interested to see some proof of your capabilities. Not saying you should tell me the secrets, I'm just curious to see what you can do instead of discussing propaganda.

If you really want to get in contact with Space X people, find out who they are and where they live and pay them a visit (serious). Don't forget to bring some of your work so you don't seem like a nutbar ;)